Let’s hope Einstein’s profound mistake about the nature of space leads to a new insight into the nature of space and time and avert the impending catastrophe of accelerated heating of the atmosphere by the recent microwave explosion caused by profuse use of ovens and internet (mobiles, storage, Bitcoin, Facebook etc).
The atmosphere gets energized with a momentous speed, certainly since the smartphone revolution. Most of the produced microwaves linger in te atmosphere, which means heating it ever faster, this is what is happening now and it wont get less unless a stop and abolishment of microwave sources is enforced.
To slow the climate change is not an easy ride and especially in the West, with their culture of individualism, government infringement on perceived personal freedom will give big problems. The reluctance of the western elite to really do significant things has to do with certain restrictions e.a. which would have to be imposed and that is not popular. I think the government must address the people with an appeal to their own responsibility in terms of the society as a whole and that difficult times are easier when you cooperate than when you are in constant conflict, that eats away at concentration for problems to be solved in the world at large.
We must learn, especially from each other.
If there is one thing microwaves do well it is ‘energizing’ water molecules, the abundant vapor in the air we breath, it means microwaves warm the water vapor in the atmosphere, especially the lower atmosphere. The percentage of water vapor in the air (up to 4%, at 30*C) differs locally (lower atmosphere) and temporally (season). (CO2 is less than 0.1% in atmosphere, a trace gas)
The recent heat waves coincide with the microwave explosion by social media on the internet, and now crypto-revolution, .
The massive use of cell phones and their clouds adds an increasing amount of EM field energy in to the atmosphere; it not only heats the air, it also increases the ‘mass’ of the atmosphere. Because the atmosphere gets intrinsically heavier by produced energy (=mass) and by pollution, the atmospheric turbulence will become heavier as well, this is what we see happening now, conditions get more extreme causing greater ‘friction’ in established patterns, because more ‘mass’ is available, increasing freak events; a pattern going of the rail as we experience the pending disaster for Nature and Humankind.
I quote Wiki on microwave: Microwaves are absorbed by moisture (water) in the atmosphere, and the attenuation ( ) increases with frequency , becoming a significant factor( ‘rain fade’ is absorption of microwave radio frequency signal by atmospheric rain, snow or ice, and losses etc.) at the high end of the band. So all this absorbed radiation has warmed the water vapour and thus, the atmosphere which fades out in space.
In general the climate change also runs parallel to the start and increasing use of radio waves, ‘the ether’, the radio was (in) the ether, you remember? It started small, very small compared to the tsunami today. So here we get to the heart of the matter. What about the ether?
Only a thorough understanding of the nature of space could bring minds together to contemplate the impact of microwave radiation on the climate, possibly even local weather, when flows are understood.
But at this moment science has no frame of mind, no adequate paradigm, to understand and deal with the microwave impact on the atmosphere and by consequence the weather, because notwithstanding a host of eminent scientists declaring existence of ether, the central idea of the herd is still that Einstein dealt with ether once and for all and that space as a vacuum, a void, ‘nothingness really’, is ‘the thing’ today, ether is just ‘retarded thinking’.
Another fallacy is the idea of the microwaves having very low energy; and this fallacy may be ‘catastrophe in the making’, the wrong appreciation of the impact of the microwaves on the ‘fabric’ of space. They may have low energy, but they are certainly penetrating, massively.
I’m not the first to raise the issue of radio-and micro wave impact on climate, but i may be one of the few who seeks to explain it in terms of the physical character of reality. The microwave is one of the building blocks of reality in the electromagnetic fields and it may have low energy but it has more penetration. And this is where the danger lies. The microwave blanket over the present earth is reaching higher and higher, it is penetrating the glaciers and melting them from the inside, making them brittle, totally different from the sunray melt on the surface of the glacier.
I lived three summers (12-14) in Ladakh in the Himalayas north of Kashmir. From the same house I saw in August all mountains below 5000m snowless, only ever smaller glaciers remained near the peaks, some will have gone by now. It is going very fast, it is no longer geological or climatic time, it is ‘human time’, anthropocene, (anthro-obscene?), end of holocene, we see it happening before our very eyes, the excessive heatwaves, the excessive rainfall, the excessive droughts, the excessive storms and what other excessives are in the making yet (pandemics, sure).
I have long hoped that some temporary planetary alignment was causing the heating by inner friction, but since the heat change is now so acute I have changed my mind. It was my hope because if the CO2 theory is correct I do not see how any of the proposed targets is ever going to be met, and if met, then will show any change in the short term, say 50 – 100 years. The huge problem is that if we don’t see results we do not know whether we are going right, then all depends on the strength of the theory and its arguments (proofs).
If we put all our cards on greenhouse gasses and ignore the microwave pollution this could be catastrophic. Carbon is a long term pollution, microwave can be tackled in 5-10 years if effort is put into it and it might show a big change in the going already.
I see very well that restricting microwave use, banning mobile phones, glass-fibre everywhere, in stead of G5, is a bridge too far at the moment for many politician who feel the hot breath of the captains of industry in their neck, but that still maybe the only remedy to stop this accelerating ‘thaw’ of glaciers around the world, (Greenland, Antarctica)and ease the erratic weather which is just developing and of which we certainly haven’t seen the worst. If these high temperatures continue then there are 2 possibilities, either the CO2 is the main cause and we have thus entered the point of no return, that is, acceleration has set in and can hardly be stopped anymore given the political climate in the world. There is no emergency feeling, it is collective cognitive dissonance in the corridors of power, a lot of talking to ease the mind, but total impotence, no significant cutting action. No one is legally committed, anyone can do as they like and in 10 years they see each other and say well how awful that most of us have done so little about it. There is no political will and I do agree that it is a devilishly difficult problem and it will not go away as some problems do over time. The only sure thing is that this will get worse and certainly when we choose to ignore warnings and wilfully overlook possible major sources of warming because the consequences are extremely inconvenient, they’re dire. But that is what real, necessary measures will be like, extremely inconvenient. Democracy is probably not capable of getting it done. But are the military going to do it, do what? Or the billionaires?
When I see how spoilt I am, only the difference in my lifetime from the fifties till now, in those 70 years the planet is spoilt and still, objectively, historically speaking, as a human being I have had a dream-life, I have lived the best of lives and worlds in the West, but it was our lifestyles and choices in life that made us go where we are now in the midst of our own garbage, in broken violent societies, desperate for an answer how to proceed, where to begin, it is huge, it is overwhelming, that is what it
is, it is, I am afraid, too big for us, it is not yet inevitable, when we are lucky, but it simply seems too much for us to come together, that is the big problem…. People. Their privileges. That can fast go terribly wrong and then you get this military intervention and the creation of a police state financed by the Oligarchs of this world and was end of fight against the deterrioration of the globe as a whole, slowing down is whatever happens the first fase in the slow-down, may be even a fairy stop.
Space is saturated with wavefields, space is nothing but wavefields one might say, so the whole idea of vacuum or void is profoundly counterfactual, it is an abstract near mathematical concept not relating to actual fact. In my approach space and energy cannot be separated, and so space and matter cannot be separated, space is a plenum, the Ur-plenum.
The vacuum/void concept is a profoundly mistaken terminology and it would be better to ban that concept from scientific parlance forthwith. (vacuum energy!!!!!, what `is this??)).
**********
Ryan air flight Eindhoven
6 miles high contemplation 11/8/19
Is the black hole the extreme density of space, like it is in the pixall, the density that is ‘pure light’? It is the borderpoint of space.
Energy is what creates form, this form is the coherent mass, the ‘mass’ is the anchor of the form in the Deep-field.
The mass is the inertia that the mass-energy creates. Since all form is always in motion relative to the deepfield ‘as form’, it is not so as ‘substance’ , because form ‘borrows’ substance from the deepfield, but is at any speed at rest in the deepfield, because that is its substance and inertia of all matter and energy.
This is the mystery why every mass is at rest relative to the deepfield.
Why form is moving while substance is at rest, why everything has its own frame of reference.
Why light has at any moment the same speed relative to the deepfield, which is always at rest in an object, this is the inertia.
inertia is the resistance to change the mode of transformation any object is in.
Mode of transformation may be a gravity field, which creates a degree of inertia in objects.
*****************
Mic message recorded 22/7/19.
In nature big and small don’t exist, the biggest star, it’s nothing without an electron. ‘permanent creation’ is the basis of time, it’s the becoming, the constant renewal, it is what is now, permanently.
Our idea of time springs from the observance of change: every moment is creation, so to speak, because moments do not exist, are manmade, it is permanent creation
The past is gone, the future not yet created, the now is eternal, only Mystics know this, scientists don’t.
Einstein, at the time he created relativity theory, thought that the Milky Way was the universe, that Andromeda was a nebula and the rest were all individual stars and so did all the others, only a century ago, now only 30 years ago they found out that they missed 95% of the energy of the universe. Every time they manage to do as if the latest find is a corroboration of their views, but a lot is doubtful, they haven’t got a clue, desperate.
Because of this state of ‘lost grip’ of theoretical physics, it may be fruitful to do a thorough rethink of all the tools that are used and not questioned for their adequacy, even mathematics. That is what I do here. I show there is a ‘parallel math’ and especially ‘parallel geometry’ which expresses all number relationships in whole or rational numbers.
Funny to think that all these galaxies of which many are like our galaxy and that we see as stars, are dark inside like our own Milky Way. How come something that looks like a star is dark inside?
How come our galaxy must also look like a star from a great distance though it is black inside ‘as we know’.
We live in an optical illusion of Darkness only see the light that is coming towards us. This is why photons cannot exist
the concept of a photon is a particle that radiates all around, that does not fit the facts.
But if that were the case there couldn’t be shadows. Our night reveals the shadow of the Earth and so the Universe, the Moon and the planets are bathing in light which we don’t see, in the night we only see the reflection that’s coming towards us, all other light passes unseen, don’t forget here: the full blast of daylight just passing us by in the night, without us seeing it. It is weird.
Our universe is full of light, but we don’t see it, we only observe the electromagnetic wavefronts that come towards us, nothing else.
Amidst dazzling light, we live in darkness. Endowed with bright intelligence, we choose darkness. Given freedom, we choose bondage.
*********
Jan van Duin <ya*****@***il.com>
To:
Ya*****@***oo.com
19 Aug at 12:43, Original mic and script, see changes below
When we conclude that numbers are at the heart of creation then it is good to have a mathematics in store with numbers that are whole, sacred, not broken in pieces, relating to each other in whole units and to see what they have to tell us.
This is not your usual precision at a local level, but it fits perfectly when viewed in the broader context.
It is how nature juggles with integers, but gets it right.
So we end up with a math that may have formed a geometrical base in antiquity, but maybe not.
Anyway it should be known to exist if only for its beauty, where so much more is hidden.
It is about the integrity of integers, a radical change of perspective, where numbers themselves show the rules between them and lead the way.
There is nothing personal about this mathematics, anybody could have done this, it’s just a matter of piecing a puzzle together, the pieces are there, it’s finding the order, I can hardly believe this has not been done in the past.
Here it is as I could conceive of it as a logician, because I am no mathematician at all.
My model reveals a deeper logic between natural numbers.
It may also be a better tool to get to understand quantum uncertainty, because there is no perfect fit in the underlying numbers, the ‘fit’ is in the ‘ whole’, not in particulars.
I hope this work will serve to open the minds of some young mathematicians and lead them on an innovative track to the ultimate truth of this time-honoured system.
Jan van Duin <ya*****@***il.com>
To:
Ya*****@***oo.com
19 Aug at 12:43,
When we conclude that numbers are at the heart of creation then it is good to have a mathematics in store with numbers that are whole, sacred, not broken in pieces, relating to each other in whole units and to see what they may have to tell us.
This math is not your usual precision at a local level, but it fits perfectly when viewed in the broader context.
It is how nature juggles with integers, but gets it right.
So we end up with a mathematics that may have formed a geometry in antiquity, but maybe not.
Anyway it should be known to exist if only for its beauty and harmony, where so much more is hidden.
It is about the integrity of integers, a radical change of perspective, where numbers themselves show the rules and bonds between them and lead the way.
There is nothing personal about this mathematics, anybody could have done this, it’s just a matter of piecing a puzzle together, the pieces are there, it’s finding the order, I can hardly believe this has not been done in the past, it is long overdue this sees the light of day.
Here it is presented as I could conceive of it as a logician, because I am no mathematician at all, which also indicates we are dealing with very simple math. Although critics will call it ‘Kindergarten math’ I ‘d rather call it ‘integral root relations’ or ‘parallel math’.
My model reveals a deeper logic between natural numbers in several areas.
It may also prove a useful tool to get to understand quantum uncertainty, because there is no perfect fit in the underlying numbers, the ‘fit’ is in the ‘ whole’, not in particulars. This is the more embedded view with the ’roundness’ of the integers involved.
I hope this work will serve to open the minds of some young mathematicians and lead them on an innovative track to the ultimate truth of this time honoured number system and geometry.
Jan van Duin <ya*****@***il.com>
To:
Ya*****@***oo.com
26 Aug at 11:20
You take risks because you desire a certain quality of life
Matter is a state of mind
Just as we cannot subtract space from matter, so we cannot subtract space from mind. The space of mind is the deeper space.
Matter is opaque in our experience but it is transparent and spacious at quantum level. The border between matter and ‘free’ space is blurred because of quantum activity.
But also, in my view, because of the permanent flux of physical reality.
It is the form which takes physical shape by the substance of the deep field
The form borrows its substance from the deep field, it has no eigen-mass.
All form is a transformation of the Deep Field.
Space is the conscious expression of the deepfield.
How important is the universe to our daily lives anyway, most can’t be bothered.
We cannot undo the universe, but neither can it guide us.. It’s mostly imaginary and will always be. What we see is the past, and a deep past at that.
The galactic and intergalactic space is cold and dangerous to life because of radiation.
(we live in our so far safe open incubator, but are mortally wounding it now).
The space we’re living in though is a different thing. That is living space, a space alive and modified by environmental change, die Lebenswelt, the world.
This space of our direct experience is the creative space of life.
This is where we come from, our knowledge is the result of longstanding experience in ‘living this life’, but what it is……
remains a mystery.
